Conciliation Under Section 10 of POSH Act, 2013: Rules & Process

 

Introduction: Understanding Conciliation Under Section 10

Section 10 of the POSH Act, 2013, introduces a delicate, often misunderstood statutory mechanism: the option for conciliation prior to initiating a formal inquiry. The Internal Committee (IC) must understand that conciliation is strictly an option reserved exclusively for the complainant upon her explicit written request. The IC has no statutory authority to mandate, force, or even suggest conciliation to the parties, as coercing a settlement undermines the protective spirit of the Act and constitutes a severe procedural violation.

1. No Monetary Settlement in POSH Conciliation

A central restriction under Section 10(1) is that no monetary settlement can be made the basis of conciliation. The scope of conciliation is strictly non-monetary and remedial, focusing on resolutions such as formal written apologies, reassignment of reporting lines, changes in physical seating, or voluntary undertakings of behavioral boundary compliance.

If an IC permits financial compensation to be negotiated or paid during a Section 10 conciliation, the settlement becomes legally invalid, exposing the employer and the committee to judicial challenge.

Conciliation Under Section 10 of POSH Act, 2013: Rules & Process


2. Conciliation Agreement and Documentation Process

When a valid conciliation agreement is reached, the IC must record the agreed terms, draft a formal conciliation report, and forward it to the employer for implementation, while providing copies to both parties.

Once conciliation is successfully recorded, no further formal inquiry into that specific complaint is conducted by the IC. However, if the respondent fails to comply with any condition of the conciliation settlement, Section 10(4) empowers the complainant to approach the IC again, at which point the committee must immediately launch a full formal inquiry.

3. Preventing Coercion and Misuse of Conciliation

The committee must also guard against conciliation being used as a delay tactic by respondents or corporate leadership seeking to quieten a scandal. Conciliation proceedings must be strictly time-bound and transparently documented.

The IC must ensure that the complainant's choice to opt for or reject conciliation is entirely voluntary, informed, and free from subtle organizational pressures or fear of professional disadvantage.

4. Maintaining Statutory Integrity Under Section 10

Ultimately, conciliation is a tool for restorative resolution in appropriate cases, not a bypass mechanism for accountability. By maintaining strict boundaries—prohibiting monetary payouts, preventing coercion, and ensuring enforceable terms—the IC upholds the integrity of Section 10 while providing a legally compliant pathway for amicable settlement when genuinely sought by the aggrieved woman.

Conclusion

Conciliation under Section 10 of the POSH Act, 2013, must remain voluntary, properly documented, and free from monetary settlements or organizational pressure. Internal Committees should follow the statutory safeguards carefully to protect the complainant's choice and maintain the integrity of the POSH inquiry process.

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Posh Law - Role, Powers and Accountability of the Internal Committee

The Internal Committee (IC) is the adjudicatory cornerstone of the POSH framework. Mandated under the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013, the IC functions as a quasi-judicial body tasked with conducting fair and time-bound inquiries into complaints of workplace sexual harassment. The composition of the IC is legally prescribed: a senior woman employee as Presiding Officer, at least two internal members committed to women’s causes or legal knowledge, and one independent external member. Improper constitution may invalidate proceedings and expose the employer to statutory penalty. The independence and competence of the external member are particularly critical to ensure neutrality. The IC has powers similar to those of a civil court for summoning witnesses, requiring document production, and recording evidence. It must adhere to principles of natural justice providing both parties an opportunity to be heard, permitting cross-questio...
Read more

Posh law in India : Shanta Kumar v Council of Scientific and Industrial Research

Shanta Kumar v Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) Facts of the Case The petitioner, Mrs. Shanta Kumar, filed a petition challenging the proceedings of a Complaint Committee and the subsequent order by the Disciplinary Authority. The case involved allegations of sexual harassment made by the petitioner against respondent no. 3 (Dr. Sunil Bose) at the Central Road Research Institute (CRRI). The main incident in question occurred on 29.04.2005, where the petitioner alleged that respondent no.3 entered the laboratory, stopped a machine, snatched samples from her, pushed her out and locked the laboratory. Initially the complaint did not explicitly mention sexual harassment, but later the petitioner claimed that she had been subjected to “all kinds of harassment including sexual harassment”. A complaint committee was formed to investigate the allegations and it concluded that the complaint was not of sexual harassment but a case of altercation in an uncongenial work enviro...
Read more

Impact of POSH Act on Workplace Culture: A Case Study Approach.

The POSH Act has brought about a significant shift in workplace culture in India, particularly in organizations that have taken proactive steps to implement its provisions. Companies that have established robust Internal Complaints Committees (ICCs) and conducted awareness programs have seen a decrease in instances of sexual harassment, as employees are more informed and empowered to report misconduct. Case studies from large corporations like Infosys and TCS show how training programs, workshops, and open-door policies have helped in creating safer workplaces. These organizations report increased employee satisfaction and trust in the grievance redressal process. Employees are now more confident that complaints will be taken seriously and that appropriate action will be taken against offenders. However, there are still gaps in smaller organizations and unorganized sectors where the implementation of the POSH Act is often lax. In these environments, cultural norms may still perpetuate...
Read more