About Posh act

On July 25, 2022, an Odisha college student accused the school's physics instructor of rape and sexual harassment. The accused lecturer, who was the institution's reader, had also held the role of NCC officer in the Naval wing. Despite the female student coming to the institute with a formal complaint, the school's internal committee did not discover any proof of the claims she claimed. The probe didn't start until the Higher Education Department became aware of the situation. A Presidency University student from Kolkata filed a formal complaint with the internal committee of the university accusing Mahitosh Mandal, the former head of the department, of sexual harassment on July 17, 2022. It is believed that the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013, is essential for protecting female employees from sexual harassment at the workplace. It is significant to highlight that educational institutions play a significant role

In today's workplace, fostering a safe, respectful, and inclusive environment is paramount. The Prevention of Sexual Harassment (Posh) at Workplace Act, enacted in India in 2013, is a significant legislative step towards ensuring such an environment. It mandates organizations to take proactive measures in preventing, prohibiting, and redressing sexual harassment at the workplace. One of the most effective ways to comply with this legislation and cultivate a positive workplace culture is through comprehensive Posh law training for employees. Why Posh Law Training is Essential Legal Compliance The Posh Act requires every organization with ten or more employees to constitute an Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) and conduct regular training sessions. Failure to comply can result in hefty penalties, damage to the organization's reputation, and a loss of trust among employees. Awareness and Sensitivity Training helps employees understand what constitutes sexual harassment, the imp

In a significant ruling that reinforced the importance of implementing the Prevention of Sexual Harassment (POSH) Act in its true spirit, the Allahabad High Court delivered a decisive judgment in the case of Sanjeev Kumar v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2021). This judgment emphasized that the non-compliance or delay in constituting an Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) by an organization is a serious violation of the Act and infringes upon the fundamental rights of employees. The Crux of the Case The case arose from a writ petition filed by Sanjeev Kumar, an employee of the Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Limited (UPPCL), who alleged that despite repeated requests, the organization had failed to constitute an ICC as mandated by the POSH Act. Kumar contended that this non-compliance not only violated the provisions of the Act but also infringed upon the fundamental rights of employees, including their right to a safe and secure work environment. The Allahabad High Court's Ruling In it

In a landmark ruling that reinforced the Protection of Sexual Harassment (POSH) Act's commitment to creating safe and secure workplaces, the Supreme Court of India delivered a groundbreaking judgment in the case of Harish Dhandharia v. Chairman, Ahmedabad Stamp Vendors Association (2019). This decision expanded the scope of the POSH Act , ensuring that its provisions apply not only to employees but also to any third party or outsider who enters the workplace premises, including customers, clients, or visitors. The Background of the Case The case arose from a petition filed by Harish Dhandharia, a stamp vendor and member of the Ahmedabad Stamp Vendors Association. Dhandharia alleged that he had been subjected to sexual harassment by the association's chairman during a meeting held at the association's premises. However, when he approached the Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) constituted by the association, his complaint was dismissed on the grounds that he was not an empl

In a progressive step towards ensuring a safe and secure work environment for all employees, the Delhi High Court delivered a landmark judgment in the case of Sethunath Singh v. Ministry of Home Affairs (2018). This ruling reinforced the principle that the Prevention of Sexual Harassment (POSH) Act extends its protection to all employees, irrespective of their employment status, be it permanent, temporary, or ad-hoc. The Genesis of the Case The case arose from a petition filed by Sethunath Singh, a former ad-hoc employee of the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA). Singh alleged that he had been subjected to sexual harassment by a superior officer during his tenure. However, when he approached the Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) constituted by the MHA, his complaint was dismissed on the grounds that he was not a permanent employee and, therefore, not covered under the purview of the POSH Act. The Pivotal Ruling The Delhi High Court took cognizance of the matter and delivered a landmark